015 vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Feature015SeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageVueGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 391★ 33,952
First released20262015
ReplacesAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose 015 if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Vue
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
015 details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is 015 or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while 015 is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are 015 and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. 015 is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run 015 and SeaweedFS with Docker?

015: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons