SeaweedFS vs wger

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSwger
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0free
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, one-click
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 6,616
First released20152022
ReplacesAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose wger if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Mature project with 6.6k GitHub stars
wger details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or wger better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while wger is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and wger free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and wger under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and wger with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. wger: yes.

Related comparisons