SeaweedFS vs Webtor

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSWebtor
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoDockerfile
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 666
First released20152025
ReplacesAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose Webtor if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Dockerfile
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Webtor details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or Webtor better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Webtor is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and Webtor free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Webtor under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and Webtor with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. Webtor: yes.

Related comparisons