SeaweedFS vs WebDAV Server Go

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSWebDAV Server Go
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 5,750
First released20152017
ReplacesAmazon S3Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose WebDAV Server Go if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.8k GitHub stars
WebDAV Server Go details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or WebDAV Server Go better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while WebDAV Server Go is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and WebDAV Server Go free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WebDAV Server Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and WebDAV Server Go with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. WebDAV Server Go: yes.

Related comparisons