SeaweedFS vs Uguu

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSUguu
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 1,198
First released20152025
ReplacesAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose Uguu if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Uguu details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or Uguu better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Uguu is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and Uguu free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Uguu under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and Uguu with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. Uguu: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons