SeaweedFS vs Tiny File Manager

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSTiny File Manager
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 5,959
First released20152016
ReplacesAmazon S3Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose Tiny File Manager if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
Tiny File Manager details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or Tiny File Manager better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Tiny File Manager is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and Tiny File Manager free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tiny File Manager under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and Tiny File Manager with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. Tiny File Manager: yes.

Related comparisons