SeaweedFS vs Pydio Cells Client

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSPydio Cells Client
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 32
First released20152019
ReplacesAmazon S3Dropbox, Box

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose Pydio Cells Client if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Pydio Cells Client details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or Pydio Cells Client better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Pydio Cells Client is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and Pydio Cells Client free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pydio Cells Client under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and Pydio Cells Client with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. Pydio Cells Client: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons