SeaweedFS vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSResilio Sync alternative Onionshare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 7,055
First released20152014
ReplacesAmazon S3WeTransfer, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons