SeaweedFS vs Slink

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSSlink
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 1,579
First released20152026
ReplacesAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose Slink if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
Slink details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or Slink better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Slink is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and Slink free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Slink under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and Slink with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. Slink: yes.

Related comparisons