SeaweedFS vs slcl

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSeaweedFSslcl
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoC
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 33,952
First released20152020
ReplacesAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose slcl if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in C
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
slcl details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or slcl better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while slcl is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and slcl free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and slcl under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and slcl with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. slcl: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons