SHSelfHostIndex

SeaweedFS vs rsync.net alternative Stash NoDuplicate

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
SE SeaweedFS Fast distributed storage for blobs and files VS RS rsync.net alternative Stash NoDuplicate Self-hosted WebDAV server for file synchronization
FeatureSeaweedFSrsync.net alternative Stash NoDuplicate
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 33,952★ 1,217
First released20152009
ReplacesAmazon S3Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Choose rsync.net alternative Stash NoDuplicate if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
rsync.net alternative Stash NoDuplicate details

Frequently asked questions

Is SeaweedFS or rsync.net alternative Stash NoDuplicate better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while rsync.net alternative Stash NoDuplicate is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SeaweedFS and rsync.net alternative Stash NoDuplicate free and open-source?

Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and rsync.net alternative Stash NoDuplicate under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SeaweedFS and rsync.net alternative Stash NoDuplicate with Docker?

SeaweedFS: yes. rsync.net alternative Stash NoDuplicate: yes.

Related comparisons