Restic vs Rustic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureResticRustic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseApache-2.0
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerbinary
GitHub stars★ 35,412★ 3,170
First released20152022
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteBackblaze, CrashPlan

Why pick each one

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Choose Rustic if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Rustic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Restic or Rustic better?

Neither is universally better. Restic has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Restic and Rustic free and open-source?

Yes. Restic is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Rustic under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Restic and Rustic with Docker?

Restic: yes. Rustic: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons