SHSelfHostIndex

Read-later nono Reminiscence vs Shaarli

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
RE Read-later nono Reminiscence Self-hosted bookmark and archive manager VS Shaarli Personal, minimalist link-sharing bookmark app
FeatureRead-later nono ReminiscenceShaarli
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score16 · At risk88 · Excellent
CategoryBookmarks & Read-It-LaterBookmarks & Read-It-Later
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,857★ 3,899
First released20172013
ReplacesPocket, Raindrop.ioPocket, Delicious

What are Read-later nono Reminiscence and Shaarli?

Read-later nono Reminiscence

Reminiscence is a self-hosted bookmark and archive manager that saves a snapshot of each page you bookmark. It provides full-text search, tagging, and a public or private mode.

  • Page snapshot archiving
  • Full-text search
  • Public and private modes

Shaarli

Shaarli is a personal, minimalist, database-free bookmarking application that can also act as a microblog of links. It targets individuals wanting a lightweight link log. It is deployed via Docker or a PHP stack.

  • No database, flat-file storage
  • Public and private links
  • Tagging and RSS feed
  • Plugin support

Read the full Shaarli guide →

Read-later nono Reminiscence vs Shaarli: key differences

Read-later nono Reminiscence is written in JavaScript, while Shaarli is built with PHP. Licensing differs — MIT for Read-later nono Reminiscence versus GPL-3.0 for Shaarli. Shaarli is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Read-later nono Reminiscence. Shaarli is the more established project (first released 2013), while Read-later nono Reminiscence arrived in 2017. Shaarli has the considerably larger community, at 3,899 GitHub stars versus 1,857.

Why pick each one

Choose Read-later nono Reminiscence if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
Read-later nono Reminiscence details

Choose Shaarli if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Easy to back up
  • Can be public or private

Watch out for

  • Dated default theme
  • Single-user only
Shaarli details

Frequently asked questions

Is Read-later nono Reminiscence or Shaarli better?

Shaarli is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Read-later nono Reminiscence if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Read-later nono Reminiscence and Shaarli free and open-source?

Yes. Read-later nono Reminiscence is licensed under MIT and Shaarli under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Read-later nono Reminiscence and Shaarli with Docker?

Read-later nono Reminiscence: yes. Shaarli: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Read-later nono Reminiscence or Shaarli?

Shaarli has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Read-later nono Reminiscence. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons