Archivy vs Shaarli
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Archivy
Self-hosted knowledge repository for bookmarks and notes
VS
Shaarli
Personal, minimalist link-sharing bookmark app
| Feature | Archivy | Shaarli |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,268 | ★ 3,888 |
| First released | 2020 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Evernote | Pocket, Delicious |
Why pick each one
Choose Archivy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Archivy or Shaarli better?
Shaarli is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Archivy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Archivy and Shaarli free and open-source?
Yes. Archivy is licensed under MIT and Shaarli under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Archivy and Shaarli with Docker?
Archivy: yes. Shaarli: yes.