Rclone vs Docker Volume Backup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Rclone
Sync and copy files to dozens of cloud providers
VS
Docker Volume Backup
Backup tool for Docker volumes to local or remote storage
| Feature | Rclone | Docker Volume Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 58,995 | ★ 3,944 |
| First released | 2014 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Backblaze | Veeam |
Why pick each one
Choose Docker Volume Backup if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.9k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Rclone or Docker Volume Backup better?
Neither is universally better. Rclone has the larger community, while Docker Volume Backup is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Rclone and Docker Volume Backup free and open-source?
Yes. Rclone is licensed under MIT and Docker Volume Backup under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Rclone and Docker Volume Backup with Docker?
Rclone: yes. Docker Volume Backup: yes.