Amanda vs Docker Volume Backup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAmandaDocker Volume Backup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseMPL-2.0
LanguageCGo
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 267★ 3,944
First released19912021
ReplacesVeeam, CommVaultVeeam

Why pick each one

Choose Amanda if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Written in C
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Amanda details

Choose Docker Volume Backup if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.9k GitHub stars)
Docker Volume Backup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Amanda or Docker Volume Backup better?

Docker Volume Backup is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Amanda if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Amanda and Docker Volume Backup free and open-source?

Yes. Amanda is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Docker Volume Backup under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Amanda and Docker Volume Backup with Docker?

Amanda: check the project docs for container support. Docker Volume Backup: yes.

Related comparisons