Minarca Backup vs Docker Volume Backup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMinarca BackupDocker Volume Backup
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score31 · At risk89 · Excellent
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseAGPL-3.0MPL-2.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 263★ 4,017
First released20162021
ReplacesCrashPlan, VeeamVeeam

What are Minarca Backup and Docker Volume Backup?

Minarca Backup

Minarca is a centralized backup solution built on rdiff-backup that lets users back up multiple machines and restore their own files through a web interface. It is designed for organizations protecting many endpoints.

  • Centralized endpoint backup
  • Self-service restore
  • rdiff-backup engine
  • Web management

Docker Volume Backup

Docker Volume Backup is a small companion container that periodically archives Docker volumes and uploads them to local, S3, or WebDAV destinations. It can stop and restart containers cleanly during backup.

  • Docker volume archiving
  • S3 and WebDAV targets
  • Container stop hooks
  • Encryption support

Minarca Backup vs Docker Volume Backup: key differences

Minarca Backup is written in Python, while Docker Volume Backup is built with Go. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for Minarca Backup versus MPL-2.0 for Docker Volume Backup. Docker Volume Backup is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Minarca Backup. Minarca Backup is the more established project (first released 2016), while Docker Volume Backup arrived in 2021. Docker Volume Backup has the considerably larger community, at 4,017 GitHub stars versus 263.

Why pick each one

Choose Minarca Backup if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Minarca Backup details

Choose Docker Volume Backup if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4k GitHub stars)
Docker Volume Backup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Minarca Backup or Docker Volume Backup better?

Docker Volume Backup is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Minarca Backup if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Minarca Backup and Docker Volume Backup free and open-source?

Yes. Minarca Backup is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Docker Volume Backup under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Minarca Backup and Docker Volume Backup with Docker?

Minarca Backup: yes. Docker Volume Backup: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Minarca Backup or Docker Volume Backup?

Docker Volume Backup has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Minarca Backup. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons