pgBackRest vs Docker Volume Backup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturepgBackRestDocker Volume Backup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguageCGo
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 4,296★ 3,944
First released20132021
ReplacesVeeamVeeam

Why pick each one

Choose pgBackRest if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
pgBackRest details

Choose Docker Volume Backup if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.9k GitHub stars)
Docker Volume Backup details

Frequently asked questions

Is pgBackRest or Docker Volume Backup better?

Neither is universally better. pgBackRest has the larger community, while Docker Volume Backup is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are pgBackRest and Docker Volume Backup free and open-source?

Yes. pgBackRest is licensed under MIT and Docker Volume Backup under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run pgBackRest and Docker Volume Backup with Docker?

pgBackRest: yes. Docker Volume Backup: yes.

Related comparisons