Bareos vs Rclone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bareos
Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced
VS
Rclone
Sync and copy files to dozens of cloud providers
| Feature | Bareos | Rclone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C++ | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,232 | ★ 58,995 |
| First released | 2010 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Veeam, CommVault | Backblaze |
Why pick each one
Choose Bareos if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is Bareos or Rclone better?
Rclone is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Bareos if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Bareos and Rclone free and open-source?
Yes. Bareos is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Rclone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bareos and Rclone with Docker?
Bareos: yes. Rclone: yes.