Backrest vs Rclone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBackrestRclone
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 7,071★ 58,995
First released20242014
ReplacesBackblazeBackblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Backrest if…

  • Makes Restic approachable
  • Good scheduling
  • Lightweight
Backrest details

Choose Rclone if…

  • Works with almost any cloud
  • Extremely versatile
  • Reliable
Rclone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backrest or Rclone better?

Neither is universally better. Rclone has the larger community, while Backrest is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Backrest and Rclone free and open-source?

Yes. Backrest is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Rclone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backrest and Rclone with Docker?

Backrest: yes. Rclone: yes.

Related comparisons