Puter vs Tiny File Manager

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterTiny File Manager
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 5,959
First released20262016
ReplacesGoogle Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose Tiny File Manager if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
Tiny File Manager details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Tiny File Manager better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Tiny File Manager is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Puter and Tiny File Manager free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tiny File Manager under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and Tiny File Manager with Docker?

Puter: yes. Tiny File Manager: yes.

Related comparisons