Apaxy vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureApaxyPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageShellTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 1,924★ 43,003
First released20202026
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose Apaxy if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Apaxy details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Apaxy or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Apaxy and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Apaxy is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Apaxy and Puter with Docker?

Apaxy: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons