Ceph vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCephPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseLGPL-2.1AGPL-3.0
LanguageC++TypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 16,905★ 43,003
First released20062026
ReplacesAmazon S3, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Ceph if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 16.9k GitHub stars
Ceph details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Ceph or Puter better?

Puter is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Ceph if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Ceph and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Ceph is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Ceph and Puter with Docker?

Ceph: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons