Dufs vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDufsPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageRustTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 10,562★ 43,003
First released20222026
ReplacesDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Dufs if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.6k GitHub stars
Dufs details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Dufs or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Dufs is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Dufs and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Dufs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Dufs and Puter with Docker?

Dufs: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons