Puter vs rustypaste

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePuterrustypaste
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptRust
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB32 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 43,003★ 1,192
First released20262021
ReplacesWeTransfer, Imgur

Why pick each one

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Choose rustypaste if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
rustypaste details

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or rustypaste better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while rustypaste is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Puter and rustypaste free and open-source?

Yes. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and rustypaste under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Puter and rustypaste with Docker?

Puter: yes. rustypaste: yes.

Related comparisons