Protomaps vs Traccar

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureProtomapsTraccar
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseApache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptJava
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,980★ 7,563
First released20212012
ReplacesMapbox, Google MapsGoogle Maps, Life360

Why pick each one

Choose Protomaps if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Protomaps details

Choose Traccar if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Java
Traccar details

Frequently asked questions

Is Protomaps or Traccar better?

Neither is universally better. Traccar has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Protomaps and Traccar free and open-source?

Yes. Protomaps is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Traccar under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Protomaps and Traccar with Docker?

Protomaps: check the project docs for container support. Traccar: yes.

Related comparisons