Pomf vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePomfSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 922★ 33,952
First released20152015
ReplacesWeTransfer, ImgurAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Pomf if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Pomf details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Pomf or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Pomf is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Pomf and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Pomf is licensed under MIT and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Pomf and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Pomf: check the project docs for container support. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons