PluXml vs Textpattern
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
PluXml
XML-based blog and CMS without a database
VS
Textpattern
Flexible, elegant content management and blogging system
| Feature | PluXml | Textpattern |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 235 | ★ 878 |
| First released | 2007 | 2004 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Blogger | WordPress, Blogger |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is PluXml or Textpattern better?
Neither is universally better. Textpattern has the larger community, while PluXml is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are PluXml and Textpattern free and open-source?
Yes. PluXml is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Textpattern under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run PluXml and Textpattern with Docker?
PluXml: yes. Textpattern: yes.