Blogofile vs PluXml
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Blogofile | PluXml |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 11 · At risk | 76 · Good |
| Status | Archived | Actively maintained |
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source, bare-metal | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 347 | ★ 235 |
| First released | 2009 | 2007 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Blogger | WordPress, Blogger |
What are Blogofile and PluXml?
Blogofile
Blogofile is a static website compiler that lets you write a blog or site using flat files and templates, producing pure HTML output. It includes built-in blog features such as archives, categories, and feeds.
- Static blog generation
- Categories and archives
- Atom and RSS feeds
- Mako templating
PluXml
PluXml is an open-source blog and content management system that stores all content in XML files, requiring no database. It is lightweight and aimed at simple personal sites and blogs.
- XML flat-file storage
- No database required
- Theme and plugin support
- Lightweight
Blogofile vs PluXml: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: Blogofile's repository is archived and no longer developed, while PluXml is actively maintained. Blogofile is written in Python, while PluXml is built with PHP. Licensing differs — MIT for Blogofile versus GPL-2.0 for PluXml. Blogofile is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for PluXml. PluXml is the more established project (first released 2007), while Blogofile arrived in 2009. PluXml lists first-class Docker deployment; Blogofile does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Blogofile if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose PluXml if…
- No database needed
- Easy to back up
Watch out for
- Smaller community
- Limited modern themes
Frequently asked questions
Is Blogofile or PluXml better?
Neither is universally better. Blogofile has the larger community, while PluXml is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Blogofile and PluXml free and open-source?
Yes. Blogofile is licensed under MIT and PluXml under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Blogofile and PluXml with Docker?
Blogofile: check the project docs for container support. PluXml: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Blogofile or PluXml?
Blogofile has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for PluXml. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.