Blogofile vs PluXml
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Blogofile
Static blog and website compiler in Python
VS
PluXml
XML-based blog and CMS without a database
| Feature | Blogofile | PluXml |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source, bare-metal | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 347 | ★ 235 |
| First released | 2009 | 2007 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Blogger | WordPress, Blogger |
Why pick each one
Choose Blogofile if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Blogofile or PluXml better?
Neither is universally better. Blogofile has the larger community, while PluXml is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Blogofile and PluXml free and open-source?
Yes. Blogofile is licensed under MIT and PluXml under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Blogofile and PluXml with Docker?
Blogofile: check the project docs for container support. PluXml: yes.