Blogofile vs Textpattern
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Blogofile
Static blog and website compiler in Python
VS
Textpattern
Flexible, elegant content management and blogging system
| Feature | Blogofile | Textpattern |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | source, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 347 | ★ 878 |
| First released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Blogger | WordPress, Blogger |
Why pick each one
Choose Blogofile if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Blogofile or Textpattern better?
Neither is universally better. Textpattern has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Blogofile and Textpattern free and open-source?
Yes. Blogofile is licensed under MIT and Textpattern under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Blogofile and Textpattern with Docker?
Blogofile: check the project docs for container support. Textpattern: yes.