Plik vs Updog
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Plik
Temporary file upload system (Wetransfer like)
VS
Updog
Replacement for Python SimpleHTTPServer with uploads
| Feature | Plik | Updog |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,810 | ★ 3,386 |
| First released | 2026 | 2019 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose Plik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose Updog if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Plik or Updog better?
Updog is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Plik if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Plik and Updog free and open-source?
Yes. Plik is licensed under MIT and Updog under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Plik and Updog with Docker?
Plik: check the project docs for container support. Updog: check the project docs for container support.