Pingvin Share vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePingvin ShareSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseApache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 4,684★ 33,952
First released20222015
ReplacesWeTransfer, Firefox SendAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Pingvin Share if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.7k GitHub stars)
Pingvin Share details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Pingvin Share or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Pingvin Share is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Pingvin Share and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Pingvin Share is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Pingvin Share and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Pingvin Share: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons