Kleeja vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKleejaSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 193★ 33,952
First released20062015
ReplacesWeTransferAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Kleeja if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Kleeja details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kleeja or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Kleeja is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kleeja and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Kleeja is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kleeja and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Kleeja: check the project docs for container support. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons