Linx vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLinxSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,581★ 33,952
First released20152015
ReplacesWeTransfer, ImgurAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Linx if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Linx details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Linx or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Linx is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Linx and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Linx is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Linx and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Linx: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons