Pingvin Share vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePingvin SharePuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseAGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 4,684★ 43,003
First released20222026
ReplacesWeTransfer, Firefox Send

Why pick each one

Choose Pingvin Share if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.7k GitHub stars)
Pingvin Share details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Pingvin Share or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Pingvin Share is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Pingvin Share and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Pingvin Share is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Pingvin Share and Puter with Docker?

Pingvin Share: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons