Ping Exporter vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePing ExporterUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, kubernetesdocker
GitHub stars★ 631★ 89,960
First released20182021
ReplacesPingPlotter, ThousandEyesPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Ping Exporter if…

  • Trivial to deploy
  • Minimal configuration
Ping Exporter details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Ping Exporter or Uptime Kuma better?

Neither is universally better. Uptime Kuma has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Ping Exporter and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Ping Exporter is licensed under MIT and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Ping Exporter and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Ping Exporter: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons