Glances vs Ping Exporter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlancesPing Exporter
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseLGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, binary, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 33,269★ 631
First released20122018
ReplacesDatadogPingPlotter, ThousandEyes

Why pick each one

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Choose Ping Exporter if…

  • Trivial to deploy
  • Minimal configuration
Ping Exporter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glances or Ping Exporter better?

Neither is universally better. Glances has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Glances and Ping Exporter free and open-source?

Yes. Glances is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Ping Exporter under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glances and Ping Exporter with Docker?

Glances: yes. Ping Exporter: yes.

Related comparisons