Peekaping vs Upptime
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Peekaping | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | ≈5-minute setup |
| Health score | 72 · Good | 76 · Good |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Markdown |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | one-click, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,195 | ★ 17,168 |
| First released | 2024 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Better Uptime | Statuspage, Pingdom |
What are Peekaping and Upptime?
Peekaping
Peekaping is a self-hosted uptime monitoring tool with status pages and notifications, inspired by Uptime Kuma. It supports many monitor types and aims for a fast, modern user experience.
- Multiple monitor types
- Status pages
- Notification integrations
- Modern UI
Upptime
Upptime is an uptime monitor and status page powered entirely by GitHub Actions and Issues. It runs checks on a schedule, opens issues for downtime, and publishes a status page with no server required.
- Runs on GitHub Actions
- Auto-generated status page
- Downtime issues and alerts
- No servers to maintain
Peekaping vs Upptime: key differences
Peekaping is written in Go, while Upptime is built with Markdown. Upptime is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for Peekaping. Upptime is the more established project (first released 2020), while Peekaping arrived in 2024. Upptime has the considerably larger community, at 17,168 GitHub stars versus 1,195. Peekaping lists first-class Docker deployment; Upptime does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Peekaping if…
- Lightweight Go backend
- Clean interface
Watch out for
- Young project
- Smaller community
Choose Upptime if…
- Completely free hosting
- Zero infrastructure
Watch out for
- Tied to GitHub
- Check interval limited by Actions
Frequently asked questions
Is Peekaping or Upptime better?
Neither is universally better. Upptime has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Peekaping and Upptime free and open-source?
Yes. Peekaping is licensed under MIT and Upptime under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Peekaping and Upptime with Docker?
Peekaping: yes. Upptime: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Peekaping or Upptime?
Upptime has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for Peekaping. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.