Peekaping vs Upptime
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Peekaping
Self-hosted uptime monitoring and status page service
VS
Upptime
GitHub-powered uptime monitor and status page
| Feature | Peekaping | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Markdown |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | one-click, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,169 | ★ 17,114 |
| First released | 2024 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Better Uptime | Statuspage, Pingdom |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Peekaping or Upptime better?
Neither is universally better. Upptime has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Peekaping and Upptime free and open-source?
Yes. Peekaping is licensed under MIT and Upptime under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Peekaping and Upptime with Docker?
Peekaping: yes. Upptime: check the project docs for container support.