Healthchecks vs Upptime
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Healthchecks
Cron job and scheduled task monitoring
VS
Upptime
GitHub-powered uptime monitor and status page
| Feature | Healthchecks | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Python | Markdown |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | one-click, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,226 | ★ 17,114 |
| First released | 2015 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Pingdom | Statuspage, Pingdom |
Why pick each one
Choose Healthchecks if…
- Catches silently failing jobs
- Lots of notification channels
- Lightweight
Frequently asked questions
Is Healthchecks or Upptime better?
Neither is universally better. Upptime has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Healthchecks and Upptime free and open-source?
Yes. Healthchecks is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Upptime under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Healthchecks and Upptime with Docker?
Healthchecks: yes. Upptime: check the project docs for container support.