Gatus vs Healthchecks
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Gatus
Developer-oriented health dashboard and status page
VS
Healthchecks
Cron job and scheduled task monitoring
| Feature | Gatus | Healthchecks |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,748 | ★ 10,226 |
| First released | 2019 | 2015 |
| Replaces | UptimeRobot, Pingdom | Pingdom |
Why pick each one
Choose Healthchecks if…
- Catches silently failing jobs
- Lots of notification channels
- Lightweight
Frequently asked questions
Is Gatus or Healthchecks better?
Neither is universally better. Gatus has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Gatus and Healthchecks free and open-source?
Yes. Gatus is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Healthchecks under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gatus and Healthchecks with Docker?
Gatus: yes. Healthchecks: yes.