Cachet vs Peekaping
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Cachet
Open-source status page system for communicating outages
VS
Peekaping
Self-hosted uptime monitoring and status page service
| Feature | Cachet | Peekaping |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 76 · Good | 72 · Good |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,248 | ★ 1,195 |
| First released | 2014 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Statuspage, Better Uptime | Pingdom, Better Uptime |
What are Cachet and Peekaping?
Cachet
Cachet is an open-source status page system written in PHP (Laravel) for communicating downtime and incidents. It supports components, incident timelines, scheduled maintenance windows, metrics, and subscriber notifications.
- Public status page
- Incident timeline updates
- Scheduled maintenance windows
- Subscriber notifications
Peekaping
Peekaping is a self-hosted uptime monitoring tool with status pages and notifications, inspired by Uptime Kuma. It supports many monitor types and aims for a fast, modern user experience.
- Multiple monitor types
- Status pages
- Notification integrations
- Modern UI
Cachet vs Peekaping: key differences
Cachet is written in PHP, while Peekaping is built with Go. Licensing differs — BSD-3-Clause for Cachet versus MIT for Peekaping. Peekaping is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Cachet. Cachet is the more established project (first released 2014), while Peekaping arrived in 2024. Cachet has the considerably larger community, at 15,248 GitHub stars versus 1,195.
Why pick each one
Choose Cachet if…
- Polished public-facing page
- REST API
Watch out for
- Development has been intermittent
- Needs a database
Choose Peekaping if…
- Lightweight Go backend
- Clean interface
Watch out for
- Young project
- Smaller community
Frequently asked questions
Is Cachet or Peekaping better?
Neither is universally better. Cachet has the larger community, while Peekaping is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cachet and Peekaping free and open-source?
Yes. Cachet is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Peekaping under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cachet and Peekaping with Docker?
Cachet: yes. Peekaping: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Cachet or Peekaping?
Peekaping has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Cachet. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.