Lunalytics vs Peekaping
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Lunalytics
Simple self-hosted website and service uptime monitor
VS
Peekaping
Self-hosted uptime monitoring and status page service
| Feature | Lunalytics | Peekaping |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 0 · At risk | 72 · Good |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | CSS | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1 | ★ 1,195 |
| First released | 2023 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Better Uptime | Pingdom, Better Uptime |
What are Lunalytics and Peekaping?
Lunalytics
Lunalytics is a self-hosted uptime monitoring application that tracks websites and services and notifies you of downtime. It offers a clean interface, multi-user support, and several notification channels.
- Website and API monitoring
- Multi-user access
- Notification integrations
- Clean dashboard
Peekaping
Peekaping is a self-hosted uptime monitoring tool with status pages and notifications, inspired by Uptime Kuma. It supports many monitor types and aims for a fast, modern user experience.
- Multiple monitor types
- Status pages
- Notification integrations
- Modern UI
Lunalytics vs Peekaping: key differences
Lunalytics is written in CSS, while Peekaping is built with Go. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for Lunalytics versus MIT for Peekaping. Peekaping is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Lunalytics. Peekaping has the considerably larger community, at 1,195 GitHub stars versus 1.
Why pick each one
Choose Lunalytics if…
- Easy to set up
- Friendly interface
Watch out for
- Newer project
- Smaller feature set
Choose Peekaping if…
- Lightweight Go backend
- Clean interface
Watch out for
- Young project
- Smaller community
Frequently asked questions
Is Lunalytics or Peekaping better?
Neither is universally better. Peekaping has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Lunalytics and Peekaping free and open-source?
Yes. Lunalytics is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Peekaping under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lunalytics and Peekaping with Docker?
Lunalytics: yes. Peekaping: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Lunalytics or Peekaping?
Peekaping has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Lunalytics. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.