Cloudprober vs Lunalytics
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Lunalytics
Simple self-hosted website and service uptime monitor
| Feature | Cloudprober | Lunalytics |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 81 · Excellent | 0 · At risk |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | CSS |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 703 | ★ 1 |
| First released | 2017 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Catchpoint | Pingdom, Better Uptime |
What are Cloudprober and Lunalytics?
Cloudprober
Cloudprober is an active monitoring tool that runs probes against your services to measure availability and latency from an external perspective. It auto-discovers targets, exports Prometheus metrics, and supports HTTP, ping, DNS, gRPC, and UDP probes.
- Black-box probing for many protocols
- Automatic target discovery
- Native Prometheus metrics
- Low memory footprint
Lunalytics
Lunalytics is a self-hosted uptime monitoring application that tracks websites and services and notifies you of downtime. It offers a clean interface, multi-user support, and several notification channels.
- Website and API monitoring
- Multi-user access
- Notification integrations
- Clean dashboard
Cloudprober vs Lunalytics: key differences
Cloudprober is written in Go, while Lunalytics is built with CSS. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Cloudprober versus GPL-3.0 for Lunalytics. Cloudprober is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Lunalytics. Cloudprober is the more established project (first released 2017), while Lunalytics arrived in 2023. Cloudprober has the considerably larger community, at 703 GitHub stars versus 1.
Why pick each one
Choose Cloudprober if…
- Cloud-native target discovery
- Single static binary
Watch out for
- YAML configuration required
- No bundled dashboard
Choose Lunalytics if…
- Easy to set up
- Friendly interface
Watch out for
- Newer project
- Smaller feature set
Frequently asked questions
Is Cloudprober or Lunalytics better?
Neither is universally better. Cloudprober has the larger community, while Lunalytics is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cloudprober and Lunalytics free and open-source?
Yes. Cloudprober is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Lunalytics under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cloudprober and Lunalytics with Docker?
Cloudprober: yes. Lunalytics: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Cloudprober or Lunalytics?
Cloudprober has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Lunalytics. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.