Checkmate vs Cloudprober
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Checkmate
Open-source uptime and infrastructure monitoring tool
VS
Cloudprober
Active probing for distributed systems and network reliability
| Feature | Checkmate | Cloudprober |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,436 | ★ 694 |
| First released | 2024 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Better Uptime | Pingdom, Catchpoint |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Checkmate or Cloudprober better?
Checkmate is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Cloudprober if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Checkmate and Cloudprober free and open-source?
Yes. Checkmate is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Cloudprober under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Checkmate and Cloudprober with Docker?
Checkmate: yes. Cloudprober: yes.