Password Pusher vs paste
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Password Pusher
Dead-simple application to securely communicate passwords (or text)
VS
paste
Minimalist self-hosted pastebin written in Go
| Feature | Password Pusher | paste |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,145 | ★ 578 |
| First released | 2026 | 2018 |
| Replaces | — | Pastebin.com, GitHub Gist |
Why pick each one
Choose Password Pusher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Password Pusher or paste better?
Neither is universally better. Password Pusher has the larger community, while paste is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Password Pusher and paste free and open-source?
Yes. Password Pusher is licensed under Apache-2.0 and paste under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Password Pusher and paste with Docker?
Password Pusher: yes. paste: yes.