Password Pusher vs sprunge
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Password Pusher
Dead-simple application to securely communicate passwords (or text)
VS
sprunge
Command-line oriented minimalist pastebin
| Feature | Password Pusher | sprunge |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,145 | ★ 721 |
| First released | 2026 | 2010 |
| Replaces | — | Pastebin.com, termbin |
Why pick each one
Choose Password Pusher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Choose sprunge if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Password Pusher or sprunge better?
Neither is universally better. Password Pusher has the larger community, while sprunge is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Password Pusher and sprunge free and open-source?
Yes. Password Pusher is licensed under Apache-2.0 and sprunge under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Password Pusher and sprunge with Docker?
Password Pusher: yes. sprunge: check the project docs for container support.