Password Pusher vs Encrypted Pastebin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Password Pusher
Dead-simple application to securely communicate passwords (or text)
VS
Encrypted Pastebin
Zero-knowledge encrypted text and code sharing
| Feature | Password Pusher | Encrypted Pastebin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Zlib |
| Language | Ruby | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,145 | ★ 83 |
| First released | 2026 | 2016 |
| Replaces | — | Pastebin.com, GitHub Gist |
Why pick each one
Choose Password Pusher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Choose Encrypted Pastebin if…
- Released under the Zlib license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is Password Pusher or Encrypted Pastebin better?
Neither is universally better. Password Pusher has the larger community, while Encrypted Pastebin is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Password Pusher and Encrypted Pastebin free and open-source?
Yes. Password Pusher is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Encrypted Pastebin under Zlib. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Password Pusher and Encrypted Pastebin with Docker?
Password Pusher: yes. Encrypted Pastebin: yes.