Password Pusher vs pasty
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Password Pusher
Dead-simple application to securely communicate passwords (or text)
VS
pasty
Fast and lightweight code-pasting server
| Feature | Password Pusher | pasty |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,145 | ★ 222 |
| First released | 2026 | 2020 |
| Replaces | — | Pastebin.com |
Why pick each one
Choose Password Pusher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Choose pasty if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Password Pusher or pasty better?
Neither is universally better. Password Pusher has the larger community, while pasty is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Password Pusher and pasty free and open-source?
Yes. Password Pusher is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pasty under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Password Pusher and pasty with Docker?
Password Pusher: yes. pasty: yes.