Password Pusher vs bin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Password Pusher
Dead-simple application to securely communicate passwords (or text)
VS
bin
Minimal, paste-only server written in Rust
| Feature | Password Pusher | bin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,145 | ★ 308 |
| First released | 2026 | 2020 |
| Replaces | — | Pastebin.com |
Why pick each one
Choose Password Pusher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Choose bin if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Rust
Frequently asked questions
Is Password Pusher or bin better?
Neither is universally better. Password Pusher has the larger community, while bin is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Password Pusher and bin free and open-source?
Yes. Password Pusher is licensed under Apache-2.0 and bin under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Password Pusher and bin with Docker?
Password Pusher: yes. bin: yes.