Parca vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureParcaUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 4,935★ 89,960
First released20212021
ReplacesDatadog ProfilerPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Parca if…

  • No code changes needed
  • Low overhead
Parca details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Parca or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Parca if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Parca and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Parca is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Parca and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Parca: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons